Objectivity in Social Inquiry

نویسندگان

چکیده

Otto Neurath and John Dewey share the understanding that science must have a prominent role in democratic social reform. This is common aim brought logical empiricism pragmatism together first half of 20th century, but there are differences between two stances. On one hand, sees limitation scientific knowledge, considering it cannot determine decisions to be taken course Such decisions, empiricist view, matter politics. other continuity among all forms inquiry and, therefore, conclusions valuational analogous their epistemic claims factual (natural or inquiry). paper investigates divergence concludes pragmatist set psychological context disregards difference objectivity inquiry.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Objectivity and Selectivity in Historical Inquiry

. . . Memory gives us access to the past, but not a direct vision of it. Thus all we can claim is to have a point of contact with past events, enabling us perhaps to divine their true shape in some degree, but not such that we can check our reconstructions by comparing them with it to see how far they are correct. For the rest, the sole criterion of truth available to us, in history as in other...

متن کامل

Objectivity of Social Science and Social Policy

The fact that the points of view, not only of the contributors but of the editors as well, are not identical even on methodological issues, stands as a guarantee that the Archiv will not fall prey to any sectarian outlook. On the other hand, agreement as to certain fundamental issues is a presupposition of the joint assumption of editorial responsibility. This agreement refers particularly to t...

متن کامل

On the Social Nature of Objectivity : 1

According to Helen Longino, objectivity is necessarily social as it depends on critical interactions in community. Justin Biddle argues that Longino’s account presupposes individuals that are completely open to any criticism; as such individuals are in principle able to criticise their beliefs on their own, Longino’s account is not really social. In the first part of my paper I argue that even ...

متن کامل

Social Biases and Solutions for Procedural Objectivity

An empirically sensitive formulation of the norms of transformative criticism must recognize that even public and shared standards of evaluation can be implemented in ways that unintentionally perpetuate and reproduce forms of social bias that are epistemically detrimental. Helen Longino’s theory can explain and redress such social bias by treating peer evaluations as hypotheses based on data a...

متن کامل

Genetics and Social Inquiry

Social science and genetic science still have fairly little engagement with one another, but the continued swift development of genetic science has certainly gained social scientists’ attention. First, some social scientists are incorporating techniques from quantitative and molecular genetics into their work. Genetic data is increasingly recognized as providing valuable leverage even for resea...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Cognitio

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1518-7187', '2316-5278']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e56666